Characteristic properties of date-palm fibre/sheep wool reinforced polyester composites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we attempted to characterise the effects of date-palm fibre (DPF) and a date-palm fibre/sheep wool hybrid in polyester to enhance high-performance and low-cost composite materials that can be used in insulation building systems, automotive parts, and home furniture. The DPF was treated using 5% NaOH solution; and the sheep wool was cleaned with 50 °C hot water and detergents. The composite specimens were prepared with different fibre contents (0%, 10%, 20%, 30% (w)) using a compression moulding technique. The effect of fibre reinforcement was analyzed in terms of the mechanical properties (tensile, flexural, impact, and hardness) and composite density. Additionally, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed on the fibres before and after treatment, and the fractured surfaces of all composite specimens were examined after tensile testing. The results showed that the 20% DPF/sheep wool hybrid reinforced polyester produced the best results. The ultimate tensile strength and modulus were 27 MPa and 3.69 GPa, respectively. The ultimate flexural strength and flexural modulus were 35.4 and 2507 MPa, respectively. The impact strength was 39.5 kJ/m2 and the hardness was 64 HB. The density decreased to the lowest value of 1.02 g/cm3 with the 30% DPF/sheep wool hybrid. The SEM showed good adhesion and interfacial bonding between DPF/sheep wool hybrid fibres and the polyester matrix, particularly at 20% fibre content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".