MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386951874 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3318529

Deep Learning Meets Swarm Intelligence for UAV-Assisted IoT Coverage in Massive MIMO

2023· article· en· W4386951874 on OpenAlexafffund
Mobeen Mahmood, MohammadMahdi Ghadaksaz, Asil Koç, Tho Le‐Ngoc

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHuawei Technologies
KeywordsComputer scienceBeamformingRelayMIMOBase stationReal-time computingBasebandChannel (broadcasting)Computer networkPower (physics)TelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study considers an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-assisted multiuser massive multiple-input multiple-output (MU-mMIMO) systems, where a decode-and-forward (DF) relay in the form of an UAV facilitates the transmission of multiple data streams from a base station (BS) to multiple Internet of Things (IoT) users. A joint optimization problem of hybrid beamforming (HBF), UAV relay positioning, and power allocation (PA) to multiple IoT users to maximize the total achievable rate (AR) is investigated. The study adopts a geometry-based millimeter-wave (mmWave) channel model for both links and proposes three different swarm intelligence (SI)-based algorithmic solutions to optimize: 1) UAV location with equal PA; 2) PA with fixed UAV location; and 3) joint PA with UAV deployment. The radio frequency (RF) stages are designed to reduce the number of RF chains based on the slow time-varying angular information, while the baseband (BB) stages are designed using the reduced-dimension effective channel matrices. Then, a novel deep learning (DL)-based low-complexity joint HBF, UAV location, and PA optimization scheme (J-HBF-DLLPA) is proposed via fully connected deep neural network (DNN), consisting of an offline training phase, and an online prediction of UAV location and optimal power values for maximizing the AR. The illustrative results show that the proposed algorithmic solutions can attain higher capacity and reduce average delay for delay-constrained transmissions in a UAV-assisted MU-mMIMO IoT systems. Additionally, the proposed J-HBF-DLLPA can closely approach the optimal capacity while significantly reducing the runtime by 99%, which makes the DL-based solution a promising implementation for real-time online applications in UAV-assisted MU-mMIMO IoT systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and ModelingFrench-language works237,207