MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386952508 · doi:10.1089/jpm.2023.0130

Experience of Care Among Adults With Acute Leukemia Near the End of Life: A Scoping Review

2023· review· en· W4386952508 on OpenAlexaff
Argin Malakian, Gary Rodin, Kimberley Widger, Ridwaanah Ali, Angela E. Mahendiran, Samantha Mayo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Palliative Medicine · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePalliative careEnd-of-life careData extractionMEDLINEAcute carePopulationFamily medicineQuality of life (healthcare)Qualitative researchHealth careNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background:Acute leukemia is a cancer of the blood and bone marrow with a high symptom burden and a high mortality rate in adults. The quality of end-of-life care among this patient population is deemed to be low based on health care administrative data, though the patient experience is not included in this evaluation. Objective:This scoping review aims at exploring and mapping the current research literature on the experience of care among adults with incurable acute leukemia near the end of life. Design:The JBI framework guided our scoping review, and the protocol was prospectively registered in the Open Science Forum. Results:A total of 5661 unique articles were screened for title and abstract, and 44 were selected for full text. After a manual search, five studies published in seven articles were selected for data extraction, including three qualitative and two quantitative studies. Two studies used family caregivers as patient proxies, two studies engaged patients directly, whereas one study obtained data from patients and family caregivers. Patient care in acute settings was reported in all studies, with most patients dying in acute care settings. Patients and family caregivers often valued an open and honest approach, with sufficient time for dialogue with their providers. Discussions about prognosis, palliative care, and hospice care were often late or incomplete. The medicalization of end-of-life care, including intensive care unit admissions and invasive medical procedures, were viewed as the norm by some providers, though perceived as distressing for both patients and their loved ones. Conclusions:Adults with acute leukemia face significant challenges in accessing high-quality end-of-life care brought about by the complex nature of their disease and its treatment. A systematic exploration of the end-of-life experience among these patients through direct patient engagement or by way of patient reporting proxies is needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.062
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.062
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0160.018
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.172
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Palliative MedicineSame topicPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesFrench-language works237,207