MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386956673 · doi:10.55905/cuadv15n9-060

As instituições privadas estão tomando decisões públicas: um estudo sobre Rio Grande do Sul e Ceará

2023· article· pt· W4386956673 on OpenAlexaff
Mariângela Bairros, Gisele Gallicchio, Patrícia Souza Marchand

Bibliographic record

VenueCuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo · 2023
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Public Policy
Canadian institutionsPrivy Council Office
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neste artigo apresentamos levantamento realizado no Rio Grande do Sul e Ceará acerca das instituições privadas que atuam na área de educação nestes estados. Trata-se de uma pesquisa que ocorre de forma simultânea no RS e CE e aqui apresentamos resultados parciais de mapeamento que ocorreu de janeiro a junho de 2023 e janeiro a junho de 2022. Estruturamos através de duas figuras as instituições e a intervenção do privado no público, com o objetivo de deixar claro que atualmente temos uma linha muito tênue entre púbico e privado. A pesquisa diz respeito a participações destas instituições, nas formações, no gerenciamento e controle da ação educacional dentro das escolas. Identificamos que a ação das instituições privadas difere nos dois estados. Enquanto no CE elas estão dentro das escolas, intervindo na gestão da escola e na sala de aula, na avaliação dos alunos, na formação dos professores, no RS, o privado age diretamente nas formações dos professores presencial e online. Como premissa de nossas considerações finais, temos por objetivo jogar luz sobre o processo acelerado da invasão do setor privado no território do público.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score0.672

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCuadernos de Educación y DesarrolloSame topicEducation and Public PolicyFrench-language works237,207