MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386958938 · doi:10.60015/bjvas/v08i1a17

Retrograde intramedullary pinning for femur fracture management in a Labrador dog- a case report

2020· article· en· W4386958938 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bhajan Chandra Das, Chanchal K. Roy, Sreekanta Biswas, Tuli Dey, Paritosh Kumar Biswas, Bibek Chandra Sutradhar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone fractures and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntramedullary rodLamenessFemurSurgeryRadiographyBone healingFemur fractureImplant failureXylazineInternal fixationImplantKetamineAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Long bone fractures are very common in pet and domestic animals as well as femur fractures are major lameness problem of all long bone fractures. Now-adays, there are lots of fracture management techniques performed for different fractures correction based on their nature. The present case report describes the outcome of retrograde intramedullary pinning in a dog. A three month old male, 9.65kg body weight Labrador dog was brought to SAQTVH for better treatment with the history of limping in right hind limb past 3 days. Radiographic examination confirmed that the dog was suffering from distal third diaphyseal transverse overriding femur fracture in right hind limb. Based on fracture patient assessment score (FPAS), the case was decided to do internal fixation by retrograde intramedullary pinning for femur fracture correction. Complete blood count (CBC), serum biochemistry was performed before fracture management to evaluate the patient condition. The patient was prepared aseptically and surgery was performed as standard surgical procedure with xylazine and ketamine anaesthesia. Postoperatively the patient was checked at different interval to evaluate the lameness grade, functional limb outcome and bone healing of the affected limb. Weight bearing and secondary callus formation was noticed at 2nd to 3rd week of post operatively and functional limb was observed at 7th week postoperatively. Follow up checking by clinically and radiographically was perform until six month of age of the patient. After six month, implant in position and bone remodeling was observed in radiographic examination. Finally surgical efficacy of the patient was evaluated by phone conversation until 15th month of age which revealed playful life of the dog. Serum alkaline phophatase level was increased during the time of bone healing process especially 2nd to 3rd week postoperatively. So, the present case study suggested that the retrograde intramedullary pining was an effective method of femur fracture correction for dog and pin remove was not necessary if it does not cause any complication

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score0.517

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBone fractures and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207