Optimal Extrusion Shape for Fabricating Aluminium Bridge Deck Using Assembly-Based Friction Stir Welding with Bobbin Tool
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents an optimal extrusion geometry for fabricating a bridge deck. The profile of the extrusion enables the possibility of welding onto another extrusion through butt joints only. This type of welding joint is optimal in terms of both the ultimate resistance and the fatigue performance. Thus, the aluminium deck will be manufactured by welding these extrusions together through the bobbin tool friction stir welding process, resulting in a full-penetration weld, free of the kissing bond and the flash toe defects, and in which the thermal input and the stirring are symmetrical on both outer sides of the butt joint. Therefore, this geometry addresses the shortcomings of both the MIG and the conventional FSW processes and significantly increases the lifespan of the aluminium deck. This article will present the scientific and technical approach, based on the Canadian standard CSA S6:19, and will present an example of application on an aluminium/glued laminated timber bridge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".