MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SCOUR PROCESSES AROUND A COLUMN ON A SLOPED BEACH INDUCED BY BROKEN SOLITARY WAVES

2023· article· en· W4386969356 on OpenAlex
Alexander Schendel, Stefan Schimmels, Mario Welzel, Philippe April Le Quéré, Ioan Nistor, Abdolmajid Mohammadian, Nils Goseberg, Clemens Krautwald, Jacob Stolle

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCoastal Engineering Proceedings · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEarthquake and Tsunami Effects
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversity of Ottawa
FundersBundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie
KeywordsFoundation (evidence)GeologyRendering (computer graphics)Forensic engineeringCivil engineeringEngineeringGeographyComputer scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tsunamis continue to pose an existential threat to lives and infrastructure in many coastal areas around the world. Numerous studies have been conducted in recent decades to better understand the hazards and eventually mitigate risks resulting from tsunamis (Nouri et al., 2010; Palermo et al., 2013; Chock et al., 2013; Goseberg et al., 2013; Nistor et al., 2017; Stolle et al., 2018). One of these hazards is the emergence of deep scour holes around critical infrastructure and other buildings deemed community-essential, which affects their structural integrity and stability, rendering them unusable. Despite its importance, scour is still given limited and simplified consideration in foundation design guidelines related to tsunami hazards (ASCE-7 Chapter 6). This novel experimental study aims to improve the understanding of the time-variant scour process induced by single and consecutive broken solitary waves at large scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it