MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386971259 · doi:10.1115/omae2023-101645

Environmental Loading on a Concrete Gravity-Based Offshore Structure in the Presence of Freak Waves and Currents

2023· article· en· W4386971259 on OpenAlex
M. Hasanat Zaman, Ayhan Akintürk

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWave and Wind Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaCommunity Sector Council Newfoundland and Labrador
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubmarine pipelineCurrent (fluid)Momentum (technical analysis)GeologyMechanicsField (mathematics)Flux (metallurgy)WavelengthGeophysicsPhysicsGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceOceanographyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract There has been a rise in oil and gas industry activity in the offshore area of the North Seas as well as in other parts of the world. Operating offshore fixed and floating structures in such areas come with additional menaces due to the coexistence of large waves and strong currents and their consequent interactions. The effects of strong currents and large waves that move through the area may seriously impair the functionality and safety of these offshore structures, particularly when a large wave travels against a strong current since this could produce extremely high waves. In this study, the loadings of such a strong wave-current coexistence field on a concrete gravity based structure (GBS) are described both on its shaft and topside. The simulations use a 3D mass, momentum, and energy balanced model as numerical tools for predicting loads on the structure. Using mass, momentum, and energy flux conservation equations, the proposed 3D numerical model is formulated that describes the characteristics of the wave-current coexistence field. To study a variety of scenarios, incident wave and current conditions are systematically changed in the simulations. The local still water depth and the geometry of the GBS were maintained constant. The shaft has a diameter of 30m, and a length of 95m and the topside has a dimension of 50m towards incident wave direction, 75m in length, and 2m in depth. The still water depth is taken as 80m, and the estimated air gap is 15m. In each situation, the simulation lasts for three hours. The new data and information that would be generated as a result of this effort may be vital for potential inclusion in the GBS design process and hence improve structural and operational safety in the severe and wave-current coexistence environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWave and Wind Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207