MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386989190 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxad055.037

37 Improving Bronchiolitis Management at B.C. Children’s Hospital: Standardizing Care Through a Pre-printed Order

2023· article· en· W4386989190 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Riley Chen-Mack, Claire Seaton, Tom McLaughlin, Rosa Balleny

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRoyal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
KeywordsBronchiolitisMedicineMedical prescriptionPediatricsRetrospective cohort studyEmergency medicineIntensive care medicineInternal medicineRespiratory system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction/Background Bronchiolitis is the most common cause of hospital admissions during the first year of life. There is significant variation in the management of this disease. Despite supportive care being the hallmark of treatment, investigations and other treatments are commonly prescribed. Standardizing care for bronchiolitis leads to decreased resource utilization and improved patient outcomes. Pre-printed orders can standardize care and improve compliance with evidence-based medicine. Objectives To determine whether a pre-printed order (PPO) would influence length of stay and specific medication use (corticosteroids, antibiotics, bronchodilators) for patients admitted to B.C. Children’s Hospital (BCCH) with a diagnosis of bronchiolitis. Design/Methods We implemented a pre-printed order (PPO) for inpatient management of bronchiolitis at B.C. Children’s Hospital (BCCH), then conducted a retrospective chart review of children admitted to BCCH with a discharge diagnosis of bronchiolitis. We compared primary and secondary outcomes between the pre-PPO (November 24, 2017 to December 31, 2019) and post-PPO (September 22, 2021 to April 12, 2022) periods. The primary outcome was length of stay (LOS) in days, and secondary outcomes included the prescription of specific medications. Results A total of 584 patients were included in the retrospective chart review: 436 patients were from the pre-PPO period and 148 patients were from the post-PPO period. There was no difference in the LOS between the pre-PPO and post-PPO periods: median LOS was 3.00 days (2.00 to 5.00 days) and 3.00 days (2.00 to 5.00 days) in the pre- and post-PPO periods, respectively (p = 0.88). There was a decrease in prescribed antibiotics, from 36.7% to 24.7% (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.86, p = 0.01). Additionally, there was a decrease in prescribed salbutamol, from 41.5% to 29.3% (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.39 to 0.87, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in rates of PICU admission between the pre- and post-PPO periods (23.6% vs. 26.4%, OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.75 to 1.76, p = 0.5). Conclusion The implementation of a PPO for inpatient management of bronchiolitis did not affect length of stay or PICU admissions. However, there was significant reduction in prescribed antibiotics and salbutamol (both reduced in the post-PPO period). Our results suggest that a pre-printed order can improve antimicrobial stewardship and reduce unnecessary medication use, when managing a common paediatric disease. Graph Example for antibiotic/salbutamol and PICU

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicRespiratory viral infections research→French-language works237,207→