MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386990191 · doi:10.1101/2023.09.22.23295974

Cortical lesions uniquely predict motor disability accrual and form rarely in the absence of new white matter lesions in multiple sclerosis

2023· preprint· en· W4386990191 on OpenAlexaff
Erin Beck, William A Mullins, Jonadab dos Santos Silva, Stefano Filippini, Prasanna Parvathaneni, Josefina Maranzano, Mark Morrison, Daniel J. Suto, Corinne Donnay, Henry Dieckhaus, Nicholas J. Luciano, Kanika Sharma, María I. Gaitán, Jiaen Liu, Jacco A. de Zwart, Peter van Gelderen, Irene Cortese, Sridar Narayanan, Jeff H. Duyn, Govind Nair, Pascal Sati, Daniel S. Reich

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institutes of HealthMultiple Sclerosis Society
KeywordsExpanded Disability Status ScaleMultiple sclerosisHyperintensityMedicineCohortMagnetic resonance imagingClinically isolated syndromeWhite matterInternal medicineNuclear medicinePsychologyPhysical therapyRadiologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and objectives: Cortical lesions (CL) are common in multiple sclerosis (MS) and associate with disability and progressive disease. We asked whether CL continue to form in people with stable white matter lesions (WML) and whether the association of CL with worsening disability relates to pre-existing or new CL. Methods: A cohort of adults with MS were evaluated annually with 7 tesla (T) brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 3T brain and spine MRI for 2 years, and clinical assessments for 3 years. CL were identified on 7T images at each timepoint. WML and brain tissue segmentation were performed using 3T images at baseline and year 2. Results: 59 adults with MS had ≥1 7T follow-up visit (mean follow-up time 2±0.5 years). 9 had "active" relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), defined as new WML in the year prior to enrollment. Of the remaining 50, 33 had "stable" RRMS, 14 secondary progressive MS (SPMS), and 3 primary progressive MS. 16 total new CL formed in the active RRMS group (median 1, range 0-10), 7 in the stable RRMS group (median 0, range 0-5), and 4 in the progressive MS group (median 0, range 0-1) (p=0.006, stable RR vs PMS p=0.88). New CL were not associated with greater change in any individual disability measure or in a composite measure of disability worsening (worsening Expanded Disability Status Scale or 9-hole peg test or 25-foot timed walk). Baseline CL volume was higher in people with worsening disability (median 1010μl, range 13-9888 vs median 267μl, range 0-3539, p=0.001, adjusted for age and sex) and in individuals with RRMS who subsequently transitioned to SPMS (median 2183μl, range 270-9888 vs median 321μl, range 0-6392 in those who remained RRMS, p=0.01, adjusted for age and sex). Baseline WML volume was not associated with worsening disability or transition from RRMS to SPMS. Discussion: CL formation is rare in people with stable WML, even in those with worsening disability. CL but not WML burden predicts future worsening of disability, suggesting that the relationship between CL and disability progression is related to long-term effects of lesions that form in the earlier stages of disease, rather than to ongoing lesion formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.189
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207