MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386994039 · doi:10.3726/b21319

Pratiques et politiques en petite enfance

2023· book· fr· W4386994039 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Florence Pirard, Pascale Garnier

Bibliographic record

VenuePeter Lang Verlag eBooks · 2023
Typebook
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Practices and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina Institute of Atomic EnergyUniversité d'OrléansUniversité de LiègeUniversité du Québec à Montréal
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pratiques et politiques entretiennent des liens étroits, même s’ils sont souvent indirects ou peu visibles, voire déniés dans le domaine de la petite enfance, objet d’attentes croissantes et d’enjeux multiples sur la scène internationale. Ce livre collectif s'appuie sur des travaux de chercheuses et chercheurs engagés dans des analyses fondées sur des enquêtes empiriques menées auprès de professionnels, de parents et d'enfants en Belgique, en France, au Québec et en Suisse. Il met en évidence la complexité des liens entre pratiques et politiques selon différentes échelles interdépendantes : dans les micro situations de la vie quotidienne des établissements, dans les dispositifs de formation et d’accompagnement, dans les actions de politiques locales, régionales, nationales et internationales. Ces éclairages multiples et variés, toujours contextualisés, ouvrent un espace de réflexion et de débat pour les professionnels, les formateurs, les cadres et les chercheurs du domaine. Ce livre invite ainsi à porter un regard critique sur des injonctions supposées universelles qui vont à l’encontre des visées de professionnalisation et de développement d’une qualité des services pourtant recherchées. Avec les contributions de : Diane Bedoin, Anne Sophie Boucher, Catherine Bouve, Xavier Conus, Stéphanie Garcia, Christophe Genette, Marie Housen, Martine Janner Raimondi, Joanne Lehrer, Linda Mitchell, Paul Olry, Nancy Proulx, Élodie Razy, Emmanuela Rémy, Christelle Robert-Mazaye, Anne Lise Ulmann, Michel Vandenbroeck, Élodie Willemsen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Other
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablelow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Other
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Theoretical or conceptuallow
models splitAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.

The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.

Study designNot applicable · Theoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePeter Lang Verlag eBooksSame topicEducational Practices and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207