MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386994278 · doi:10.37787/tg3m5d55

Impacto de los pasivos ambientales mineros en la variación de la calidad del agua en la quebrada colorada, setiembre 2015 - agosto 2016

2023· article· es· W4386994278 on OpenAlexaff
Eliana Cabrejos, Mirtha Culqui Lozada, Aleida Cabrejos, Wilter Vásquez

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Científica Pakamuros · 2023
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Resource Management and Quality
Canadian institutionsCégep de Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En el distrito de Chugur, Hualgayoc, Cajamarca, se explota minerales desde siglo XVIII hasta la actualidad, en este período se acumuló grandes cantidades de relaves y otros pasivos ambientales. El objetivo de la presente investigación fue determinar la variación de la calidad del agua en la quebrada Colorada por efecto de los pasivos ambientales mineros desde setiembre 2015 hasta agosto 2016. Se tomaron muestras en seis periodos diferentes entre setiembre del 2015 y agosto del 2016, considerando: avenida, transición y estiaje propios del ciclo hidrológico, para ello se consideró lo establecido por el Protocolo Nacional de Monitoreo de la Calidad de las Aguas Superficiales, aprobado mediante Resolución Jefatural 182-2011-ANA y Resolución Jefatural 010-2016-ANA. Se obtuvo el análisis de veinticinco parámetros, los mismos que fueron comparados con los Estándares de Calidad Ambiental para Agua, categoría 3 “Riego de vegetales y bebida de animales”. Los pasivos ambientales mineros originan la variación de la calidad del agua en el arroyo Colorada cuyo valor de pH es preponderantemente acido llegando a un valor de 2.90, asimismo los metales aluminio, arsénico, cadmio, cobalto, cobre, hierro, manganeso, plomo y zinc registraron valores que excedieron lo establecido en el ECA – Agua para la categoría 3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Científica PakamurosSame topicWater Resource Management and QualityFrench-language works237,207