MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386996055 · doi:10.3390/min13101241

New Insights into the Genesis of Dibrova U-Th-REE Mineral Deposit (West Azov Megablock, Ukraine) Using Monazite Chemistry

2023· article· en· W4386996055 on OpenAlexaff
K. Poliakovska, V.V. Pokalyuk, Irvine R. Annesley, О. Ivanik

Bibliographic record

VenueMinerals · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité de Lorraine
KeywordsMonaziteGeologyGeochemistryZirconBiotiteMineralSchistElectron microprobeGneissMineralogyQuartzMetamorphic rockChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the monazite grains from the Dibrova rare-earth-thorium-uranium (U-Th-REE) mineral deposit within the Azov Megablock of Ukrainian Shield. U-Th-REE mineralization is associated with K-feldspar-quartz metasandstones and metagritstones (hereafter quartzites) and pegmatoids. The latter possibly represent products of ultrametamorphism/granitization of initially sedimentary clastic rocks during tectono-magmatic activation during the Paleoproterozoic. Ores are composed of quartz as a principal mineral, feldspar, sillimanite, muscovite, monazite, brannerite, uraninite, zircon, rutile, and sulfides. The purpose of this work was to obtain insights into the genesis of the mineral deposit by studying the monazite grains, their chemistry, and ages. Petrographic research work was carried out that included studying/analyzing the monazites from various monazite-bearing rocks (quartzites, pegmatoid, and biotite schist samples). A variety of methods and tools were used, including optical microscopy study, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) mapping of selected samples, as well as scanning electron microscope (SEM) and electron microprobe (EPMA) characterization of monazites, including U-Th-Pb monazite chemical dating. U-Pb-Th chemical electron microprobe dating of the monazites yielded two major distinct monazite age groups at 3.0–2.8 Ga and 2.2–2.0 Ga. The first age group corresponds to the time of formation of the Archean granitoids, which served as a source of monazite for its clastic sedimentation during the Paleoproterozoic in the Dibrova suite sediments. The second age group corresponds to the reprecipitation (i.e., remobilization) of monazite during the Paleoproterozoic tectono-magmatic activation. The location of the mineral deposit within the deep mantle-crustal Devladivska shear zone is another favorable factor for the remobilization and transport of metals. New data on the age of mineralization yield a more complete understanding of the geological history and formation of the complex polyphase rare-earth-uranium-thorium Dibrova mineral deposit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMineralsSame topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207