MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386998716 · doi:10.1101/2023.09.20.23295859

Altered placental phenotype and increased risk of placental pathology in fetal spina bifida: a matched case-control study

2023· preprint· en· W4386998716 on OpenAlexafffund
Marina White, David Grynspan, Jayden Arif‐Pardy, Tim Van Mieghem, Kristin L. Connor

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalVernon Jubilee HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaCarleton University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMaldevelopmentFetusSpina bifidaHistopathologyOdds ratioPlacentaFetal membraneChorionic villiBiologyObstetricsPregnancyGestational ageAndrologyMedicinePathologyAnatomyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Open spina bifida (SB) remains one of the most common congenital anomalies and associates with significant comorbidities in the fetus, which may, in part, be driven by placental maldevelopment. We hypothesised that placental pathologies and maldevelopment would be more prevalent in fetuses with SB compared to fetuses without congenital anomalies. Placental histopathology (H&E-stained slides) and transcriptome (Clariom D™ microarray) were evaluated for fetuses with isolated open SB undergoing either pregnancy terminations or term deliveries (cases; n=12) and control fetuses without congenital anomalies having term or preterm births (n=22). Associations between study group and placental histopathology were adjusted for fetal sex and gestational age [GA] at delivery. Relationships between placental histopathology and select placental gene expression signatures were also evaluated. Case placentae had lower placental weight than controls (median [IQR]: 263g [175, 370] vs. 455 [378, 560], p=0.001). Placental villi structural phenotype was different in cases, who had a higher proportion of immature intermediate villi than controls (32.5% [6.3, 56.3] vs. 10% [5, 13.8], p=0.01), but similar proportions of mature intermediate (10% [5, 10] vs. 10% [8.75, 11.25]) and terminal villi (22.5% [11.3, 43.8] vs. 30 [20, 36.3]), and similar odds of having many syncytial knots (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=6 [0.2, 369]) as full-term born controls. Cellular phenotypic differences in case placentae included higher odds of having many Hofbauer cells (aOR=16.2 [1.4, 580], p=0.02) and a thick syncytial membrane (aOR=146 [3, 3.46e5], p=0.007). Expression in gene pathways related to immune/inflammatory processes, spinal cord injury, and Hedgehog and Wnt signaling were associated with placental maturity in cases. This study is the first to characterize placental histopathology in a contemporary cohort of fetuses with SB. Improved knowledge on placental histopathological and genetic phenotypes in spina bifida increases our understanding of mechanisms that may drive comorbidities to ultimately reduce offspring morbidity and mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207