Speckle‐Tracking Strain Analysis for Mapping Spatiotemporal Contractility of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell (iPSC)‐Derived Cardiomyocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) hold tremendous potential for cardiovascular disease modeling, drug screening, personalized medicine, and pathophysiology studies. The availability of a robust protocol and functional assay for studying phenotypic behavior of hiPSC-CMs is essential for establishing an in vitro disease model. Many heart diseases manifest due to changes in the mechanical strain of cardiac tissue. Therefore, non-invasive evaluation of the contractility properties of hiPSC-CMs remains crucial to gain an insight into the pathogenesis of cardiac diseases. Speckle tracking-based strain analysis is an efficient non-invasive method that uses video microscopy and image analysis of beating hiPSC-CMs for quantitative evaluation of mechanical contractility properties. This article presents step-by-step protocols for extracting quantitative contractility properties of an hiPSC-CM system obtained from five members of a family, of whom three were affected by DiGeorge syndrome, using speckle tracking-based strain analysis. The hiPSCs from the family members were differentiated and purified into hiPSC-CMs using metabolic selection. Time-lapse images of hiPSC-CMs were acquired using high-spatial-resolution and high-time-resolution phase-contrast video microscopy. Speckled images were characterized by evaluating the cross-correlation coefficient, speckle size, speckle contrast, and speckle quality of the images. The optimum parameters of the speckle tracking algorithm were determined by performing sensitivity analysis concerning computation time, effective mapping area, average contraction velocity, and strain. Furthermore, the hiPSC-CM response to adrenaline was evaluated to validate the sensitivity of the strain analysis algorithm. Then, we applied speckle tracking-based strain analysis to characterize the dynamic behavior of patient-specific hiPSC-CMs from the family members affected/unaffected by DiGeorge syndrome. Here, we report an efficient and manipulation-free method to analyze the contraction displacement vector and velocity field, contraction-relaxation strain rate, and contractile cycles. Implementation of this method allows for quantitative analysis of the contractile phenotype characteristics of hiPSC-CMs to distinguish possible cardiac manifestation of DiGeorge syndrome. © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Differentiation of iPSCs into iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CMs) and metabolic selection of differentiated iPSC-CMs Support Protocol 1: Culture, maintenance, and expansion of human iPSCs Support Protocol 2: Immunohistochemistry of iPSC-CMs Basic Protocol 2: Time-lapse speckle imaging of iPSC-CMs and speckle quality characterization Support Protocol 3: Enhancement of local contrast of videos by applying contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) to all frames Support Protocol 4: Evaluation of average speckle size Support Protocol 5: Evaluation of average speckle contrast Support Protocol 6: Determination of relative peak height, Pc(x), of consecutive images acquired from video microscopy of iPSC-CMs Basic Protocol 3: Speckle tracking-based analysis of beating iPSC-CMs Support Protocol 7: Validation of sensitivity of the speckle tracking analysis for mapping the contractility of iPSC-CMs Basic Protocol 4: Data extraction, visualization, and mapping of contractile cycles of iPSC-CMs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".