Placental <scp>T2</scp>* and <scp>BOLD</scp> effect in response to hyperoxia in normal and growth‐restricted pregnancies: multicenter cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) facilitates the non-invasive in-vivo evaluation of placental oxygenation. The aims of this study were to identify and quantify a relative BOLD effect in response to hyperoxia in the human placenta and to compare it between pregnancies with and those without fetal growth restriction (FGR). METHODS: centile) and 75 non-FGR pregnancies (controls) recruited at two centers in Paris, France. Using a 1.5-Tesla MRI system, the same multi-echo gradient-recalled echo (GRE) sequences were performed at both centers to obtain placental T2* values at baseline and in hyperoxic conditions. The relative BOLD effect was calculated according to the equation 100 × (hyperoxic T2* - baseline T2*)/baseline T2*. Baseline T2* values and relative BOLD effect were compared according to EFW (FGR vs non-FGR), presence/absence of Doppler anomalies and birth weight (small-for-gestational age (SGA) vs non-SGA). RESULTS: We observed a relative BOLD effect in response to hyperoxia in the human placenta (median, 33.8% (interquartile range (IQR), 22.5-48.0%)). The relative BOLD effect did not differ significantly between pregnancies with and those without FGR (median, 34.4% (IQR, 24.1-48.5%) vs 33.7% (22.7-47.4%); P = 0.95). Baseline T2* Z-score adjusted for gestational age at MRI was significantly lower in FGR pregnancies compared with non-FGR pregnancies (median, -1.27 (IQR, -4.87 to -0.10) vs 0.33 (IQR, -0.81 to 1.02); P = 0.001). Baseline T2* Z-score was also significantly lower in those pregnancies that subsequently delivered a SGA neonate (n = 23) compared with those that delivered a non-SGA neonate (n = 62) (median, -0.75 (IQR, -3.48 to 0.29) vs 0.35 (IQR, -0.79 to 1.05); P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms a BOLD effect in the human placenta and that baseline T2* values are significantly lower in pregnancies with FGR. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether such parameters may detect placental insufficiency before it has a clinical impact on fetal growth. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | high |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".