Filial Piety Discrepancy and Well-Being among Older Chinese Canadian Immigrants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Filial piety discrepancy has been identified as an important determinant of well-being among older Chinese immigrants. However, past studies have largely examined the influence of filial piety discrepancy on psychological well-being, while the relationship between filial piety discrepancy and other domains of well-being has not been examined. Further, little is known about the potential moderating role of other key sociocultural factors in the relationship between filial piety discrepancy and well-being among older Chinese immigrants. Thus, the purpose of this dissertation was to examine the association between filial piety discrepancy and three domains of well-being, and to determine the moderating role of acculturation, living arrangement and ethnic group density in the aforementioned relationship among older Chinese Canadian immigrants. In the first manuscript, the Perceived Receipt of Filial Piety Scale (PRFPS) was found to be a reliable and valid to measure perceived filial piety receipt among middle-aged and older Chinese parents, which was used in the subsequent manuscripts to measure filial piety receipt. In the second manuscript, greater filial piety discrepancy was associated with poorer psychological, social, and physical well-being. Further, lower acculturation level was found to exacerbate the negative association of filial piety discrepancy on psychological well-being. Living arrangement did not moderate the association between filial piety discrepancy and wellbeing across all three domains. Finally, the third manuscript revealed that the negative relationship between filial piety discrepancy and social well-being was largest among for older Chinese immigrants residing in cities with small and medium sized Chinese communities. Qualitative findings did not reveal substantial ethnic group density differences in the practice and experience of filial piety discrepancy, living arrangement, acculturation, or their impact on wellbeing; however, differences in the availability of local community-based services were found. Taken together, these results suggest that the deleterious effect of filial piety discrepancy extends beyond psychological well-being, influencing social and physical domains of well-being. These findings further highlight the importance of evaluating the synergistic effects between culturally relevant factors that contribute to well-being among older Chinese Canadian immigrants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".