MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387010583 · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2023.3318604

C2BNet: A Deep Learning Architecture With Coupled Composite Backbone for Parasitic Egg Detection in Microscopic Images

2023· article· en· W4387010583 on OpenAlexaff
Zhijiang Wan, Feng Ding, Gautam Srivastava, Keping Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNatural Science Foundation of Jiangxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBackbone networkComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceFeature (linguistics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Feature learningMinimum bounding boxObject detectionFeature extractionFocus (optics)Deep learningComputer visionImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) enabled by artificial intelligence (AI) technologies can facilitate automatic diagnosis and management of chronic diseases (e.g., intestinal parasitic infection) based on 2D microscopic images. To improve model performance of object detection challenged by microscopic image characteristics (e.g., focus failure, motion blur, and whether zoomed or not), we propose coupled composite backbone network (C2BNet) to execute parasitic egg detection using 2D microscopic images. In particular, the C2BNet backbone adopts a two-path structure-based backbone and leverages model heterogeneity to learn object features from different perspectives. A novel feature composition style is proposed to flow features within the coupled composite backbone, and ensure mutual enhancement of feature representation ability among different paths of the backbone. To further improve the accuracy of detection results, we propose multiscale weighted box fusion (WBF) to fuse location and confidence scores of all bounding boxes predicted from multiscale feature maps, and iteratively refine box coordinates to form the final prediction. Experimental results on Chula-ParasiteEgg-11 dataset demonstrate that C2BNet not only performs satisfactorily compared with state-of-the-art methods, but also can focus more on learning detailed morphology features and abundant semantic features, resulting in more precise detection for parasitic eggs located in the 2D microscopic image.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health InformaticsSame topicDigital Imaging for Blood DiseasesFrench-language works237,207