An Approximate Parallel Annealing Ising Machine for Solving Traveling Salesman Problems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Annealing-based Ising machines have emerged as high-performance solvers for combinatorial optimization problems (COPs). As a typical COP with constraints imposed on the solution, traveling salesman problems (TSPs) are difficult to solve using conventional methods. To address this challenge, we design an approximate parallel annealing Ising machine (APAIM) based on an improved parallel annealing algorithm. In this design, adders are reused in the local field accumulator units (LAUs) with half-precision floating-point representation of the coefficients in the Ising model. The momentum scaling factor is approximated by a linear, incremental function to save hardware. To improve the solution quality, a buffer-based energy calculation unit selects the best solution among the found candidate results in multiple iterations. Finally, approximate adders are applied in the design for improving the speed of accumulation in the LAUs. The design and synthesis of a 64-spin APAIM show the potential of this methodology in efficiently solving complicated constrained COPs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".