Mobility and immobility during COVID-19: A narrative inquiry into the wellness of international high school students in Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Through the conceptual and analytical lens of intersectionality, this article explores the wellness of international high school students (IHSS) in Canada during COVID-19. Two research questions guided this study: 1) What does wellness mean to IHSS? and 2) How did the pandemic impact their wellness? We employed narrative inquiry as our methodology and the three commonplaces of narrative inquiry—temporality, sociality, and place—set dimensions for our inquiry. In-depth interviews were conducted with thirty IHSS from 11 different countries and two focus groups with international student coordinators in a public schoolboard in Western Canada. Our research reveals that transnational mobility and pandemic-induced immobility clashed and compounded to generate new layers of understanding of wellness for IHSS through their lived experiences. Anchoring in participants' understanding of wellness as something that allows one to utilize potentials and thrive in life, we analyzed the impacts of transnational mobility and immobility on their physical, social, mental, and emotional wellness. Our findings show that the immobility incurred by COVID lockdowns crippled an extensive range of learning opportunities for accumulating the intellectual, social, and cultural capitals that IHSS wished to pursue through transnational mobility. It also accentuated and compounded the challenges associated with transnational mobility, which were manifested in social, emotional, mental, and physical dimensions. Implications of the study include practical recommendations for developing educational strategies, resources, and policies at the micro, meso, and macro levels to better support IHSS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it