MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Faster-Than-Real-Time Hardware Emulation of Extensive Contingencies for Dynamic Security Analysis of Large-Scale Integrated AC/DC Grid

2023· article· en· W4387011300 on OpenAlexaff
Shiqi Cao, Ning Lin, Venkata Dinavahi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmulationField-programmable gate arrayComputer scienceTransient (computer programming)GridEmbedded systemHardware emulationComputer hardwareOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid expansion of modern power systems has brought a tremendous computational challenge to dynamic security analysis (DSA) tools which consequently need to process extensive contingencies. In this work, hardware emulation is investigated to accelerate the DSA solution of a large-scale AC/DC system deployed on the field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) faster-than-real-time (FTRT) execution. Electromagnetic transient (EMT) modeling of the DC grid is conducted since the fast converter dynamics require a small time-step for accuracy; in contrast, the transient stability (TS) simulation is applicable to the AC grid which tolerates a much larger step size. To coordinate the 2 different types of simulation, an interface based on dynamic voltage injection is proposed to integrate the AC and DC grids, in addition to maintaining a low hardware latency. An emulation platform consisting of multiple FPGA boards is established so that with a proper allocation it has a sufficient capacity to accommodate the system under study which has 6 ACTIVSg 500-bus systems interconnected by a 6-terminal DC grid. The efficacy of the proposed FTRT hardware emulation platform is demonstrated by 2 case studies with more than 5500 contingencies analyzed in total, where an FTRT ratio of more than 208 is achieved for the hybrid AC/DC grid, while it is over 277 times for a single 500-bus system. Furthermore, the FTRT dynamic emulation results, including the security indices, are validated by the simulation tool DSATools/TSAT

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207