Quasi-Two-Dimensional Simulation of a Rotating Detonation Engine Combustor and Injector
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A numerical simulation of an annular rotating detonation engine with stoichiometric hydrogen–oxygen is performed. A generic, well-posed, and easily implemented approach using a quasi-two-dimensional method to model the area variations through the rotating detonation engine’s injector and combustor is presented. The detonation–injector interaction is studied for the case with a ratio of four between the combustor and injector’s throat areas. A shock wave is formed in the divergent portion of the injector due to the high backpressure created by the detonation in the combustor. A Favre-averaged steady-state analysis of stream lines and particle paths reveals that the shock causes an irrecoverable loss of stagnation pressure. Stagnation pressure gain in the combustor is insufficient to make up for the loss, and the flow leaves the engine with lower stagnation pressure than in the plenum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it