Assessment of the stress crack resistance of multilayered textured HDPE geomembranes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The stress crack resistance (SCR) of different multilayered textured geomembranes (GMBs) immersed in synthetic municipal solid waste leachate at 55°C and 85°C for 50 months was assessed using their smooth edge or smooth equivalent GMBs made from the same formulation as textured GMBs. The difference between the actual thickness of the smooth edge and the nominal thickness of the GMB was shown to result in SCR values that do not reflect the true SCR of the GMB resin when assessed based on the current ASTM standard test procedure. As such, adjustments to the current test method are presented to limit its effect on SCR, especially when comparing the performance of different GMBs based on SCR. Additionally, due to variations in formulation and thickness of the textured and smooth portions of GMB rolls, a new double-notching technique was examined to assess the SCR of the textured portion. Using this technique on samples from textured and smooth portions at different incubation times showed similar initial and stabilised SCR values but different SCR degradation rates for the two different parts of the same GMB roll. Relying solely on SCR values obtained from the smooth edge/smooth equivalent GMB may thus underestimate or overestimate the degradation of multilayered textured GMBs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".