Bibliographic record
Abstract
In its essential meaning autobiography is defined by its constituent parts as the writing (graphia) of an individual life (bios) by himself or herself (auto). Although only officially recognized in the 19th century as a distinct literary genre, over time critics have come to expand both the chronology and the forms taken by those engaged in the study of life-writing. With Saint Augustine’s Confessions generally accepted as the earliest and most enduring example of a work exposing the author’s insights into his own life, subsequent narratives have expanded both the types of autobiographical writing recognized as such as well as the diverse authorship thereof. Works penned by authors as accounts of their own lives expand on Augustine’s initial contribution to include the late medieval story of Peter Abelard and lives written by saints, such as Teresa of Avila, to the works of a representative group of men and women, artists, soldiers, nuns, and housewives alive during the early modern period in Europe and the New World. From the more restrictive definitions of autobiography found in early considerations of the genre, subsequent analysis embraced a diversity of forms of life-writing, from so called ego-documents (a term coined in the early 1950s that included life-writing perceived to be marginal or less than introspective); to memoirs and diaries, by both men and women; as well as poems, letters, testimony before Inquisition tribunals, and even novels, especially those adopting a first-person account often told in picaresque terms. From its earliest, restrictive definition, therefore, autobiography has grown to embrace a wide variety of literary forms written by an equally diverse group of authors drawn from all walks of society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".