MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387033775 · doi:10.1002/jemt.24426

<scp>DeepHistoNet</scp>: A robust deep‐learning model for the classification of hepatocellular, lung, and colon carcinoma

2023· article· en· W4387033775 on OpenAlexaff
Ravindranath Kadirappa, S. Deivalakshmi, R. Pandeeswari, Seok‐Bum Ko

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroscopy Research and Technique · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI in cancer detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersScheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMachine learningConvolutional neural networkDeep learningReceiver operating characteristicPopulationArtificial neural networkRobustness (evolution)Identification (biology)Pattern recognition (psychology)Data miningMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent days, non-communicable diseases (NCDs) require more attention since they require specialized infrastructure for treatment. As per the cancer population registry estimate, nearly 800,000 new cancer cases will be detected yearly. The statistics alarm the need for early cancer detection and diagnosis. Cancer identification can be made either through manual efforts or by computer-aided algorithms. Manual efforts-based cancer detection is labor intensive and also offers more time complexity. In contrast, computer-aided algorithms offer feasibility in reducing time and manual efforts. With the motivation to develop a computer-aided diagnosis system for NCD, we developed a cancer detection methodology. In the present article, a deep learning (DL)-based cancer identification model is developed. In DL-based architectures, the features are generally extracted using convolutional neural networks. The proposed attention-guided, densely connected residual, and dilated convolution deep neural network called DeepHistoNet acquire precise patterns for classification. Experimentation has been carried out on Kasturba Medical College (KMC), TCGA-LIHC, and LC25000 datasets to prove the robustness of the model. Performance evaluation metrics like F1-score, sensitivity, specificity, recall, and accuracy validate the experimentation. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed DeepHistoNet model outperforms the other state-of-the-art methods. The proposed model has been able to classify the KMC liver dataset with 97.1% accuracy and 0.9867 value of area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), which is the best result obtained compared to the state-of-the-art techniques. The performance of the DeepHistoNet has been even better on the LC25000 dataset. On the LC25000 dataset, the proposed model achieved 99.8% classification accuracy. To our knowledge, DeepHistoNet is a novel approach for multiple histopathological image classification. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: A novel robust DL model is proposed for histopathological image carcinoma classification. The precise patterns for accurate classification are extracted using dense cross-connected residual blocks. Spatial attention is provided to the network so that the spatial information is not lost during the feature extraction. DeepHistoNet is trained and evaluated on the liver, lung, and colon histopathology datasets to demonstrate its resilience. The results are promising and outperform state-of-the-art techniques. The proposed methodology has obtained the AUC-ROC value of 0.9867 with a classification accuracy of 97.1% on the KMC dataset. The proposed DeepHistoNet has classified the LC25000 dataset with 99.8% accuracy. The results are the best obtained till date.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicroscopy Research and TechniqueSame topicAI in cancer detectionFrench-language works237,207