Origin of Deformation Twinning in bcc Tungsten and Molybdenum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Twinning is profuse in bcc transition metals (TMs) except bulk W and Mo. However, W and Mo nanocrystals surprisingly exhibit twinning during room temperature compression, which is completely unexpected as established nucleation mechanisms are not viable in them. Here, we reveal the physical origin of deformation twinning in W and Mo. We employ density functional theory (DFT) and a reduced-constraint slip method to compute the stress-dependent generalized stacking fault enthalpy (GSFH), the thermodynamic quantity to be minimized under constant loading. The simple slipped structures and GSFH lines show that compressive stresses stabilize a two-layer twin embryo, which can grow rapidly via twinning disconnections with negligible energy barriers. Direct atomistic simulations unveil the explicit twinning path in agreement with the DFT GSFH lines. Twinning is thus the preferred deformation mechanism in W and Mo when shear stresses are coupled with high compressive stresses. Furthermore, twinnability can be related to the elastic constants of a stacking fault phase (SFP). The hcp phase may serve as a candidate SFP for the {112}⟨1[over ¯]1[over ¯]1⟩ twinning system in bcc TMs and alloys, which is coincident with the {111}⟨112[over ¯]⟩ twinning in fcc structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".