MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sympatholysis: Do Women Do It Better?

2023· article· en· W4387052279 on OpenAlexaffabout
Breanne S. Collison, Daniel Kim, Gaoyang Li, Darren S. DeLorey

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBlood pressureInternal medicineHeart rateVasoconstrictionCold pressor testCardiologyNeurovascular bundleHemodynamicsBlood flowDoppler ultrasoundEndocrinologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sex differences in sympathetic neurovascular control have been reported. Indeed, our laboratory recently demonstrated that contraction-mediated inhibition of sympathetic vasoconstriction (sympatholysis) was enhanced in female compared to male rats. Whether sympatholysis is similarly enhanced in young women compared to young men has not been established. PURPOSE: To investigate the hypothesis that sympatholysis would be greater in young females compared to young males during moderate- and heavy-intensity exercise. METHODS: Young (22 ± 3 years), healthy adults (7 male, 8 female) performed a cold pressor test (CPT) at rest and during moderate- (30% of maximum work rate) and heavy- (60% of maximum work rate) intensity alternate-leg knee-extension exercise. Beat-by-beat blood pressure was measured via Finometer, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) was calculated. Leg blood flow (LBF) was measured using Doppler ultrasound, and femoral vascular conductance (FVC) was calculated as FVC = LBF/MAP. Sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness was defined as the percent decrease in FVC (%FVC) in response to the CPT. Sympatholysis was defined as the difference between the %FVC response to the CPT at rest and during exercise. RESULTS: Sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness was not different (p > 0.05) between males and females at rest (male: -38.7 ± 7.8%; female: -46.0 ± 10.4%), or during moderate- (male: -24.9 ± 3.5%; female: -19.3 ± 8.5%) or heavy- (male: -14.3 ± 4.0%; female: -9.9 ± 4.9%) intensity exercise. However, sympatholysis was greater in females than in males during both moderate (male: 13.7 ± 6.5; female: 26.7 ± 9.0, p = 0.006) and heavy- (male: 24.4 ± 7.5; female: 36.1 ± 8.0, p = 0.011) intensity exercise. CONCLUSION: Consistent with our previous finding in rats, sympatholysis was enhanced in young women compared to men. These data provide further evidence that biological sex modulates sympathetic vascular control in the skeletal muscle vascular bed. Supported by NSERC, Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207