MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Effects Of Prescribed Exercise On The Physical And Cognitive Health Of Adults With Down Syndrome

2023· article· en· W4387053892 on OpenAlexaff
Dan Gordon, Timothy N. Welsh, Nancy Crimi-Lamanna, A. G. MacPhee, Shelley L. Brown, Audrey Zinc, Marty Hoefkes, Michael Morelli, Viviane Merzbach

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDown syndrome and intellectual disability research
Canadian institutionsBibliographical Society of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStroop effectCognitionTest (biology)Executive functionsPhysical therapyMedicinePsychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationAudiologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Down syndrome (DS) is the result of the presence of either the whole or part of an additional duplication of chromosome-21. The countenance of this additional chromosome can be linked to chronotropic and respiratory incompetence, neuromuscular conditions, immunological suppression, impaired decision making, verbal reasoning, processing, and executive function. Recent works showed that American adults with DS that they engaged in just 10.1 ± 13.5 min of moderate intensity activity, coupled with 1.7 ± 9.8 min of vigorous activity. Indeed, they were shown to engage in 412.7 ± 216.6 min of sedentary time per day. Additionally, the burden to the health care sector associated with DS equates to an additional $78,500,000 per annum. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of 8-weeks of prescribed exercise and/or cognitive training on the physical and cognitive health of adults with DS. METHODS: Following ethics approval 84 participants (age 27.0 ± 8.0) from 5 countries volunteered and agreed to participate. Measures of physical fitness and cognitive function were obtained using a modified version of the 6-minute walk test, (completed twice) as well as a modified version of the talk test, while cognitive and executive function were assessed using the Corsi block test, Stroop task, and the Sustained-Attention-To-Response Task (SART) test. All tests were completed pre and post intervention. Based upon distance completed across the 6-minute walk test, participants were assigned to 8-weeks of either 3 x 30 min of walking (EXC), 6 x 20 min of cognitive training (COG), combined group of EXC and COG (COM) or no intervention (CON). Data expressed as mean ± SD. RESULTS: Reputed measures ANOVA showed a significant increase (P < 0.05) in 6-min walk distance for both EXC (55.6 ± 66.4 m) and COM (51.7 ± 65.0 m). Number of correct responses in the SART showed significant (P = 0.000) increases for EXC (9.1 ± 5.0), COG (P = 0.000) (8.5 ± 7.5) and COM (P = 0.03) (10.0 ± 23.3). STROOP non-compatible correct responses increased by 6.1% (P = 0.02) for EXC and 35.3% (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that prescribed exercise can have a profound effect on both the physical and cognitive health of adults with Down syndrome. The changes in cognitive function show evidence for enhanced decision making and critical thinking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchFrench-language works237,207