MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hemodynamic And Executive Function Responses To A Single Bout Of Aerobic And Deep-leg Squat Exercise

2023· article· en· W4387054802 on OpenAlexaffabout
Connor Dalton, Joshua Ahn, Gianna Jeyarajan, Matthew Heath

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSquatAerobic exerciseMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationCardiologyCerebral blood flowCycle ergometerRowingPhysical therapyInternal medicineHeart rateBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An acute bout of aerobic exercise ‘boosts’ postexercise executive function (EF) and is a finding - in part - attributed to an exercise-induced increase in cerebral blood flow (CBF). It is, however, less well known whether body weight exercise (i.e., deep leg squats) elicit a similar EF benefit. Indeed, deep leg squats induce intermittent changes to CBF and may result in biomolecule alterations that provide a larger magnitude postexercise EF benefit. PURPOSE: The present study sought to determine whether distinct CBF reactivity to deep leg squats and continuous aerobic exercise differentially benefit the magnitude of a postexercise EF benefit. METHODS: Participants (age range: 18 to 25 years) completed three 15-min conditions involving: (1) a non-exercise control, (2) deep leg squats with eight 1-min intervals (20 squats/min) separated by 1-min of rest, and (3) 15-min of moderate intensity aerobic exercise (60% HRR via cycle ergometer at 70 rpm). During all conditions, transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) measured middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv) to provide an estimate of exercise-based changes in CBF. EF was examined prior to and following each condition via antisaccades (i.e., saccade mirror-symmetrical to target). RESULTS: As expected, baseline to steady-state MCAv did not reliably vary for the control condition (p = 0.16), whereas deep leg squats and aerobic exercise produced peak increases in systolic MCAv of 26 cm/s and 40 cm/s, respectively (ps < 0.001). For the EF task, control condition antisaccade reaction times (RTs) did not vary from pre- to postexercise (p = 0.34), whereas deep leg squats and aerobic exercise produced a postexercise reduction in RTs (ps < 0.04). Moreover, a two-one sided statistic indicated that the magnitude of the RT reduction in deep leg squat and aerobic conditions was equivalent (p < 0.05). In other words, the magnitude of the EF benefit was equivalent across the two conditions. CONCLUSION: Deep leg squats increase CBF and provide a postexercise benefit to EF equivalent to aerobic exercise. Thus, for a single bout of exercise a hysteretic (deep leg squats) and continuous (aerobic) increase in CBF does not impact the magnitude of an EF benefit. Supported by: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyFrench-language works237,207