MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Functional Cardiovascular Changes In Response To Altered Pressure And Volume Stimuli In Elite Swimmers

2023· article· en· W4387062150 on OpenAlexaff
Amy E. Boettcher, Alexandra M. Coates, Christian P. Cheung, Trevor J. King, Margo Mountjoy, Jamie F. Burr, Katharine D. Currie

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiologyMedicineHeart rateStroke volumeIsometric exerciseInternal medicineBlood pressurePhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiac adaptations in response to chronic exercise training are attributed to repetitive pressure and/or volume overload. Sprint/strength athletes are more exposed to pressure overloads while endurance athletes are more exposed to volume overloads. Consequently, the athlete’s heart phenotype can vary based on competition distance and/or sport modality. Recent research has examined whether there are differences in how the heart responds to pressure and volume stimuli in land-based strength and endurance-trained adults. This study sought to extend these observations to elite swimmers that vary in competition distance. PURPOSE: To determine if left ventricular systolic and diastolic function responded differently to pressure and volume stimuli in short-distance (SD) and long-distance (LD) elite swimmers. METHODS: Swimmers were grouped as SD (n = 32, 26% female, 23 ± 4 years, events ≤400 m) and LD (n = 11, 36% female, 22 ± 3 years, events ≥800 m). Echocardiography images were captured in the left lateral decubitus position at rest and during a pressure [submaximal isometric handgrip (IHG)], and volume (seated position) stimulus. Images were analyzed to determine systolic (heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output) and diastolic [peak early transmitral (E) and mitral annular (E’) velocities, and E/E’] function. The change in each variable during the two stimuli relative to rest was calculated (ΔIHG = IHG-rest; ΔSEAT = seated-rest) and compared between groups using Mann-Whitney U tests with significance set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Data are presented as “median, interquartile range”. The ΔIIHG and ΔSEAT for all systolic and diastolic variables were similar between groups; however, ΔIHG E and E/E’ were trending (both P = 0.07). LD increased ΔIHG E (8.3, -3.3-20.0 cm/s) while SD decreased ΔIHG E (-6.7, -17.0-6.3 cm/s). LD also increased ΔIHG E/E’ (0.95, -0.31-1.58) while SD experienced a small reduction in ΔIHG E/E’(-0.03, -0.51-0.73). CONCLUSION: These preliminary results indicate that, regardless of competition distance, left ventricular function in SD and LD swimmers responds similarly to changes in pressure and volume. Additional investigation is warranted, however, to further examine the divergent changes in diastolic function in response to a pressure stimulus in these athletes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseFrench-language works237,207