MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Impact Of High-intensity Interval Training On Spontaneous Sympathetic Transduction In Healthy Younger Adults

2023· article· en· W4387062256 on OpenAlexaff
Beverly D. Schwartz, Jennifer L. Petterson, Breanna N. McPhee, Gabrielle G. Bowman, Haoxuan Liu, Myles W. O’Brien, Derek S. Kimmerly

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroneurographyHigh-intensity interval trainingMedicineSupine positionAerobic exerciseVO2 maxHeart rateBlood pressureInterval trainingAnaerobic exerciseInternal medicineCardiologyPhysical therapyEndocrinologyBaroreflex

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peak blood pressure responses to spontaneous bursts of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; sympathetic transduction) are inversely associated with aerobic fitness in young males, but not young females. However, no study has examined the impact of an aerobic exercise training intervention on sympathetic transduction in young healthy adults. PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that a 12-week high-intensity interval training (HIIT) intervention would improve aerobic fitness and attenuate sympathetic transduction versus a Control group. METHODS: 19 healthy younger adults were randomly assigned to a HIIT (n = 11, 7♀, 25 ± 7 years, 23.6 ± 2.4 kg/m2) or Control (n = 8, 4♀, 23 ± 1 years, 23.2 ± 2.5 kg/m2) group. Aerobic fitness was determined as relative peak oxygen consumption (V̇O2peak, indirect calorimetry) from a graded, maximal cycling test. Common peroneal MSNA (microneurography) and beat-by-beat diastolic blood pressure (DBP, finger photoplethysmography) were recorded for ~10-min during supine rest. Peak DBP increases following all MSNA bursts were used to quantify sympathetic transduction. Nadir DBP following heartbeats without MSNA bursts were also determined. All assessments were repeated after the 12-week HIIT/Control periods. HIIT (3d/week) consisted of 2, ~20-min bouts of 15 s:15 s alternating between 100% peak aerobic power: passive recovery. Each bout was separated by 5-min of passive recovery. RESULTS: HIIT improved V̇O2peak (38.2 ± 7.6 to 44.2 ± 8.3 mlO2/kg/min, P < 0.001), which was unchanged in the Control group (P = 0.304). In addition, resting MSNA burst frequency and DBP were unchanged following HIIT or Control periods. Sympathetic transduction was similar following HIIT (+1.2 ± 0.5 versus +1.4 ± 0.4 mmHg) or Control (+1.3 ± 0.8 versus +1.3 ± 0.6 mmHg) periods (Interaction P = 0.692). However, nadir DBP responses to non-MSNA heartbeats were enhanced following HIIT (-0.5 ± 0.2 versus -0.7 ± 0.2 mmHg, P = 0.005), but unchanged in the Control group (-0.6 ± 0.6 versus -0.5 ± 0.4 mmHg, P = 0.310). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that HIIT-mediated increases in aerobic fitness did not alter the pressor response to spontaneous MSNA in a group of younger males and females but may have enhanced local vascular autoregulatory control following heartbeats absent MSNA bursts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicCardiovascular and exercise physiology→French-language works237,207→