MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Lower Extremity Muscle Activation In Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

2023· article· en· W4387062889 on OpenAlexaff
Jason P. Oliemans, Donald W. Golden, Kalindra D. Walls, Eric C. Bennett, Spencer Skaper, Ranita H K Manocha, Jared R. Fletcher

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnective tissue disorders research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGait cycleGaitMedicineTreadmillPhysical medicine and rehabilitationHypermobility (travel)Preferred walking speedPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypermobility related conditions (HM) such as hypermobile type Ehlers Danlos Syndrome (hEDS) are characterized by hypermobility of the joints, pain, fatigue, and weakness. Recently, we found no significant difference in cost of transport or muscle dynamics between HM and age- and sex-matched control participants despite significantly higher self-reported pain and lower plantarflexor strength in HM. Weaker muscles require a higher level of activation to produce a given force, which may explain high self-reported walking pain and fatigue in HM. PURPOSE: To assess the effect of HM and speed on muscle activation of lower-extremity muscles during walking. METHODS: 10 HM (33.7 ± 14.6 years; 71.4 ± 11.3 kg; 169.7 ± 6.7 cm) and 10 age- and sex- matched control participants (32.9 ± 14.8 years; 66.8 ± 15.2 kg; 165.6 ± 10.4 cm) walked at 80%, 100% and 120% of their preferred walking speed on a motorized treadmill for 6 minutes at each speed. EMG sensors placed on the lateral gastrocnemius (LG), soleus (SOL), tibialis anterior (TA) and fibularis longus (FL) were used to quantify average root mean square (RMS) amplitude throughout the gait cycle, which was quantified from 10 consecutive strides during the last minute at each speed. RMS was normalized to mean activities over the gait cycle at the preferred speed. A three-way repeated measures ANOVA (speed x gait cycle phase x group) was used to assess differences in muscle activity across the gait cycle between groups and speeds. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in preferred walking speed (HM: 1.06 ± 0.31 m/s; CON: 1.17 ± 0.28 m/s, p = 0.31), but HM were ~ 50% weaker (p < 0.05) and reported ~30% greater pain (p = 0.009) compared to CON. Muscle activity increased with speed (p < 0.0001). A significant phase x group interaction for LG and SOL was seen. Across muscles, HM RMS was significantly lower during swing compared to CON at both slow and fast speeds (p < 0.05). Muscle coactivation (SOL/TA and LG/TA) was not significantly different across speeds or between groups (p > 0.245). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest similar activity of lower-extremity muscles between HM and controls, despite greater weakness and pain in HM. These results support the notion that lower-extremity ankle joint work and/or power may be reduced in HM to compensate for lower extremity muscle weakness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicConnective tissue disorders researchFrench-language works237,207