CYP26B1-related disorder: expanding the ends of the spectrum through clinical and molecular evidence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CYP26B1 metabolizes retinoic acid in the developing embryo to regulate its levels. A limited number of individuals with pathogenic variants in CYP26B1 have been documented with a varied phenotypic spectrum, spanning from a severe manifestation involving skull anomalies, craniosynostosis, encephalocele, radio-humeral fusion, oligodactyly, and a narrow thorax, to a milder presentation characterized by craniosynostosis, restricted radio-humeral joint mobility, hearing loss, and intellectual disability. Here, we report two families with CYP26B1-related phenotypes and describe the data obtained from functional studies of the variants. Exome and Sanger sequencing were used for variant identification in family 1 and family 2, respectively. Family 1 reflects a mild phenotype, which includes craniofacial dysmorphism with brachycephaly (without craniosynostosis), arachnodactyly, reduced radioulnar joint movement, conductive hearing loss, learning disability-and compound heterozygous CYP26B1 variants: (p.[(Pro118Leu)];[(Arg234Gln)]) were found. In family 2, a stillborn fetus presented a lethal phenotype with spina bifida occulta, hydrocephalus, poor skeletal mineralization, synostosis, limb defects, and a synonymous homozygous variant in CYP26B1: c.1083C > A. A minigene assay revealed that the synonymous variant created a new splice site, removing part of exon 5 (p.Val361_Asp382del). Enzymatic activity was assessed using a luciferase assay, demonstrating a notable reduction in exogenous retinoic acid metabolism for the variant p.Val361_Asp382del. (~ 3.5 × decrease compared to wild-type); comparatively, the variants p.(Pro118Leu) and p.(Arg234Gln) demonstrated a partial loss of metabolism (1.7× and 2.3× reduction, respectively). A proximity-dependent biotin identification assay reaffirmed previously reported ER-resident protein interactions. Additional work into these interactions is critical to determine if CYP26B1 is involved with other biological events on the ER. Immunofluorescence assay suggests that mutant CYP26B1 is still localized in the endoplasmic reticulum. These results indicate that novel pathogenic variants in CYP26B1 result in varying levels of enzymatic activity that impact retinoic acid metabolism and relate to the distinct phenotypes observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".