MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387077502 · doi:10.1007/s00439-023-02598-2

CYP26B1-related disorder: expanding the ends of the spectrum through clinical and molecular evidence

2023· article· en· W4387077502 on OpenAlexafffund
Karina da Costa Silveira, Inara Chacon Fonseca, Connor Oborn, Parker Wengryn, Saima Ghafoor, Alexander Beke, Ema S. Dreseris, Cassandra J. Wong, Aline Iacovone, Carrie-Lynn M. Soltys, Riyana Babul‐Hirji, Osvaldo Artigalás, Arthur Antolini‐Tavares, Anne‐Claude Gingras, Eric I. Campos, Denise P. Cavalcanti, Pekka Kannus

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Genetics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsSinai Health SystemLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMount Sinai HospitalHospital for Sick ChildrenLakeridge HealthSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoRegional Municipality of DurhamUniversity of Alberta
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloUniversity of AlbertaConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoRare Disease FoundationWomen and Children's Health Research Institute
KeywordsBiologyCraniosynostosisGeneticsSanger sequencingExome sequencingPhenotypeMutationGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CYP26B1 metabolizes retinoic acid in the developing embryo to regulate its levels. A limited number of individuals with pathogenic variants in CYP26B1 have been documented with a varied phenotypic spectrum, spanning from a severe manifestation involving skull anomalies, craniosynostosis, encephalocele, radio-humeral fusion, oligodactyly, and a narrow thorax, to a milder presentation characterized by craniosynostosis, restricted radio-humeral joint mobility, hearing loss, and intellectual disability. Here, we report two families with CYP26B1-related phenotypes and describe the data obtained from functional studies of the variants. Exome and Sanger sequencing were used for variant identification in family 1 and family 2, respectively. Family 1 reflects a mild phenotype, which includes craniofacial dysmorphism with brachycephaly (without craniosynostosis), arachnodactyly, reduced radioulnar joint movement, conductive hearing loss, learning disability-and compound heterozygous CYP26B1 variants: (p.[(Pro118Leu)];[(Arg234Gln)]) were found. In family 2, a stillborn fetus presented a lethal phenotype with spina bifida occulta, hydrocephalus, poor skeletal mineralization, synostosis, limb defects, and a synonymous homozygous variant in CYP26B1: c.1083C > A. A minigene assay revealed that the synonymous variant created a new splice site, removing part of exon 5 (p.Val361_Asp382del). Enzymatic activity was assessed using a luciferase assay, demonstrating a notable reduction in exogenous retinoic acid metabolism for the variant p.Val361_Asp382del. (~ 3.5 × decrease compared to wild-type); comparatively, the variants p.(Pro118Leu) and p.(Arg234Gln) demonstrated a partial loss of metabolism (1.7× and 2.3× reduction, respectively). A proximity-dependent biotin identification assay reaffirmed previously reported ER-resident protein interactions. Additional work into these interactions is critical to determine if CYP26B1 is involved with other biological events on the ER. Immunofluorescence assay suggests that mutant CYP26B1 is still localized in the endoplasmic reticulum. These results indicate that novel pathogenic variants in CYP26B1 result in varying levels of enzymatic activity that impact retinoic acid metabolism and relate to the distinct phenotypes observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman GeneticsSame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207