MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387078853 · doi:10.5430/ijhe.v12n5p211

Development of Academic Administration System for Excellence of Mid-Sized Schools under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office in the Northeast

2023· article· en· W4387078853 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Praphutsorn Tharmalee, Prayuth Chusorn, Chaiyuth Sirisuthi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Higher Education · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcellencePromotion (chess)Administration (probate law)Quality (philosophy)Agile software developmentService (business)Process (computing)Medical educationPsychologyBusinessPolitical scienceEngineeringComputer scienceMedicineMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An Effective Academic Administration System is essential for attaining excellence in educational institutions. Through the optimization of processes, support for schools and students, and the promotion of data-driven decision-making, such a system assists institutions in adapting to evolving educational environments and delivering high-quality education. The objectives of this research were to study the components and indicators of academic administration for the excellence of med-sized secondary schools, study the current conditions desirable conditions and priority needs index and to study the results of implementation. Research and development by conducted research in 4 phases. The results of the research were as follows: The academic administration composition for excellence in medium-sized secondary schools under the Secondary Education Service Area Office in the Northeast comprises four main components and twenty-two indicators. The current condition of the system is rated at a high level, while the desirable condition is at the highest level. The Academic Administration System encompasses four aspects: Input includes Administrator, Teachers and Staff, Students, and a conducive learning environment. The Process involves two main components and twelve sub-elements, The Output consists of four components: A flexible and agile organizational structure that supports changes, higher academic achievement among learners compared to previous years, satisfaction among administrators, teachers, staff, stakeholders and acceptance within the community. Feedback mechanisms include performance reporting to the public and utilizing evaluation results to make improvements based on recommendations. In conclusion, the Academic Administration System's comprehensive approach, encompassing input, process, output, and feedback aspects has resulted in exemplary performance establishing these secondary schools as models of excellence within the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Higher EducationSame topicTechnology-Enhanced Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207