Modeling and Parameter Identification for Human-robot Coupled Systems in Powered Lower Limb Prostheses.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Good trajectory tracking results are the basis for the implementation of other upper-level algorithms in powered lower limb prostheses, which rely on dynamics modeling and good parameter identification. However, powered lower limb prosthesis are human-robot coupled systems with human-inthe-loop, and it has been a challenge to model them as well as to perform parameter identification. This paper proposes a modeling method that can realize the decoupling of human-machine, and by constructing the linearized models of human-machine coupled system and prosthetic subsystem about the physical parameter sets respectively, and finally obtaining the relationship of their corresponding physical parameter sets, thus the method of indirectly identifying the parameters of human-machine coupled system through the prosthetic subsystem can be realized. The experimental results verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the method proposed in this paper. And the experimental results also shows that prosthetic controller should take advantage of dynamic of hip motion in order to make the wearer more comfortable and fluid when swinging the leg, and will also make the prosthesis more energy efficient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".