INTERBEING: On the Symbiosis Between INTERnet and Human BEING
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the advent of the metaverse, the future 3D spatial Internet will be about being inside the Internet rather than simply looking at it from a 2D computer or smartphone screen. This article aims at exploring the sociality dimension, AI integration in eXtended meta-uni-omni-Verse, and stigmergy principles. It puts a particular focus on the unifying design of virtual, embodied, intelligent cross-reality environments, ranging from our proposed stigmergic Society 5.0 to Interbeing based on the symbiosis between Inter(net) and (human) being—a word that is not in the dictionary yet. In addition to tokenized digital twins, we leverage on hyperintelligent life-like digital organisms that symbiomimic biological superorganisms. In doing so, they lay the foundation for creating a future stigmergic virtual society that benefits from the convergence of digital evolution and biology as well as advanced eXtended Reality wearables for tapping into the entire reality-virtuality continuum of the metaverse's emerging virtual society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it