Migraine and Tension-type Headache in Parkinson’s Disease and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy/Corticobasal Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To compare the prevalence and characteristics of migraine and tension-type headache (TTH) among patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), progressive supranuclear palsy/corticobasal syndrome (PSP/CBS), and healthy controls (HCs). Methods: This cross-sectional study involved the collection of data from consecutive PD (n = 81) and PSP/CBS (n = 21) patients along with 104 HCs. Migraine and TTH were diagnosed using the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3 rd edition criteria. Demographic data, PD or PSP/CBS details, and the presence and characteristics of migraine and TTH were collected. Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Pittsburgh Sleep-Quality Index were used to assess cognition, depression, and sleep quality, respectively. Results: A comparable proportion of PD and PSP/CBS patients reported lifetime headache (46.9% vs 23.8%; P = 0.06). TTH was more common, observed in 84.3%, 100%, and 93.5% of PD, PSP/CBS, and HCs with lifetime headache, respectively. A comparable proportion of participants in all three groups had bilateral ( P = 0.10), dull-aching headache ( P = 0.09), and occurring <5/month ( P > 0.99). The mean severity score of headache among three groups was comparable ( P = 0.39). Although the demographic and clinical characteristics of PSP/CBS patients with and without headache were comparable, PD patients with headache had a higher MDS-UPDRS-III score than those without. More than two-third PD and all PSP/CBS patients with lifetime headache reported headache improvement following parkinsonism onset. Conclusion: The prevalence and characteristics of migraine and TTH were comparable in PD, PSP/CBS, and HCs. Headache was associated with greater motor severity in PD. Following parkinsonism onset, headache improved in the majority of PD and PSP/CBS patients with lifetime headache.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".