Application of Group Counseling Based on Positive Psychology Theory in Postoperative Total Hip Arthroplasty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: This paper aims to explore and analyze the application of group counseling based on positive psychology theory in postoperative total hip arthroplasty. Methods: From July 2021 to April 2023, 110 patients with total hip arthroplasty admitted to the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics in our hospital were selected as subjects of this study. They were divided into study group and control group by simple random sampling, with 55 cases in each group. The study group received group counseling based on positive psychology theory, and the control group received general nursing care. Harris hip function score, activities of daily living score (ADL), Hamilton depression rating scale (HAM-D), Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HAM-A), and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results: Before nursing, the Harris and ADL scores of the two groups were compared, and the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). After nursing, the Harris and ADL scores of the study group were significantly better than those of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Before nursing, the HAM-D and HAM-A scores of the two groups were compared, and there was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). After nursing, the HAM-D and HAM-A scores of the study group were significantly better than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Based on the theory of positive psychology, the effect of group counseling after total hip arthroplasty is more significant, and it is recommended to be applied in clinical practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".