The tectonics of introversion and extroversion: redefining interior and exterior oceans in the supercontinent cycle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Supercontinent amalgamation is described by the end-member kinematic processes of introversion – closure of interior oceans; extroversion – closure of exterior oceans; or orthoversion – amalgamation 90° from the centroid of the previous supercontinent. However, supercontinent formations are often ascribed to contradictory mechanisms; for example, Pangaea has been argued to have formed by introversion from Pannotia/Gondwana, and extroversion from Rodinia. Conflicting interpretations arise partly from attempting to define oceans as interior or exterior based on palaeogeography or the age of the oceanic lithosphere relative to the time of supercontinent breakup. We define interior and exterior oceans relative to the external subduction ring, and associated accretionary orogens that surround amalgamated supercontinents. All oceans within the continental dominated cell and internal to the subduction ring are interior oceans. The exterior ocean is separated from the interior oceans by the subduction ring and bordered by external accretionary orogens. Wilson cycle tectonics dominate the interior continental cell, conversely, subduction of the exterior ocean is doubly vergent and lacks continent–continent collision. For the exterior ocean to close, the subduction ring must collapse upon itself, leading to the collision of external accretionary orogens. Employing this definition, Rodinia formed by extroversion, but all other supercontinents formed by introversion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".