MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387126575 · doi:10.25011/cim.v46i3.41654

<i>H19</i> Promoter DNA Methylation is Lower Among Early Abortion Patients Undergoing IVF Embryo Transfer

2023· article· en· W4387126575 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lei Han, Xianghui Zhang, Xiaohan Wu, Huishu Xu, Bao–Lin Zhang, Yiwei Pang, Pei‐Hui Ding, Caiying Zhang, Yanlin Wang, Jiajia An

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and investigative medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBinzhou Medical UniversityHealth Commission of Guizhou Province
KeywordsDNA methylationCpG siteMethylationBiologyEpigeneticsBisulfite sequencingAndrologyGenomic imprintingMolecular biologyDNMT1EmbryoChorionic villiGene expressionPlacentaGeneticsGenePregnancyFetusMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: H19 is the first long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) found to be associated with gene imprinting. It is highly expressed in the embryonic stage and may have important regulatory effects on human embryonic development. We investigated the differences between the levels of H19 promoter DNA methylation in the chorionic villi of patients who experienced spontaneous abortion (SA) following in vitro fertilization embryo transfer (IVF-ET) and those of patients with a normal early pregnancy (NEP). We also analyzed the associated DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) activity. METHODS: Chorionic villus tissue from patients with SA and NEP were collected. The DNA methylation levels of two CpG islands in the promoter region of the H19 gene in the two groups were detected by bisulfite sequencing, and the mRNA expression of DNMTs was analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: The sample size of each group was 32, and there were no significant differences in baseline data, including age, parity, and body mass index, between the two groups. Among the 7 CpG islands measured, the methylation rates of 3 CpG islands (CpG 1, 6, and 7) were significantly lower in the SA group than in the NEP group (P < 0.01). The methylation levels of the other 4 CpG islands were not significantly different between the two groups. There were no differences in the expression of DNMT1 between the two groups (P > 0.05), but DNMT3a and DNMT3b RNA levels were significantly lower in SA group than in the NEP group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The lower H19 promoter DNA methylation levels found in the chorionic villi of patients with SA patients following IVF-ET may be explained by decreased expression of DNMT3a and DNMT3b.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and investigative medicineSame topicGenetic Syndromes and ImprintingFrench-language works237,207