Leveraging Security Modeling and Information Systems Audits to Mitigate Network Vulnerabilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Advancements in digital technologies have significantly enhanced the functional capabilities of consumers and businesses alike, yet have concurrently amplified the complexities associated with cybersecurity, including theft and cyber-attacks.Consequently, auditing of information systems has emerged as a crucial security apparatus for organizations aiming to safeguard their data assets, specifically with respect to customer information.This study aims to design an information systems security and audit model that emphasizes the fortification of an organization's crucial assets via IT infrastructure security and information security management systems, in alignment with ISO 27001 standards.The proposed model seeks to assure information confidentiality, integrity, availability, and compliance with legal mandates.The study adopted the OCTAVE v2.0 method, executed in three distinct phases.In the first phase, profiles of asset-based threats were constructed.The second phase involved the identification of infrastructure vulnerabilities, whereas the final phase focused on the development of a security strategy and plans.The implementation of the proposed model yielded a marked impact, with a positive shift from 46% to 94% following the establishment of IT infrastructure security policies.The study underscores the importance of conducting a comparative analysis prior to implementation and asserts that well-defined and identified security models and information systems auditing can effectively counteract potential data leaks and cyber-attacks such as malware, phishing, spam, and ransomware.The findings suggest that a meticulous and preemptive approach to auditing and security planning can significantly bolster the resilience of an organization's digital infrastructure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".