Impact of Stepped Structures on Tsunami Wave Propagation and Overtopping Engineering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The urgent necessity to fortify coastal regions and safeguard both the natural environment and key coastal infrastructure underscores the significance of structural measures in coastal engineering.Among these, the seawall reigns as the primary fortification method.This study aims to elucidate the impact of a stepped structure on the propagation and overtopping of solitary waves when they encounter an impermeable seawall.The investigation has been conducted using ANSYS Fluent, a widely recognized commercial software.Although previous researchers have extensively used the two-dimensional volume of fluid (VOF) model, based on the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations and the k-ε turbulence closure solver, this study fills the gap in the understanding of the stepped structure's effect.It shows a commendable agreement with experimental results, proving its reliability.Simulations were executed with varied configurations of stepped structures (Step width Sw=0.6 m, 1.2 m, 1.8 m, and Step height Sh=0.3 m, 0.6 m, 0.9 m), emulating tsunami waves of constant wave height and water depth over a stepped structure on a 1:20 sloped beach.Initially, the accuracy of the results was substantiated by comparing them with experimental and numerical data of the free surface and the distribution of the pressure field on the seawall.Numerical simulations, incorporating varying wave heights, water depths, and step heights, were performed to scrutinize the evolution of waves and the pressure exerted by waves impacting the seawall.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".