MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387137399 · doi:10.52919/translang.v16i1.631

Le cybermunicipalisme devant l’espace-monde

2017· article· en· W4387137399 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandre Dubé-Belzil

Bibliographic record

VenueTraduction et Langues · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypertextHegemonyGeorge (robot)CommodificationGlobalizationSociologySpace (punctuation)Order (exchange)Media studiesCapital (architecture)AestheticsArtHumanitiesArt historyPolitical scienceVisual artsPhilosophyComputer scienceLawWorld Wide WebLinguisticsEconomyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cybermunicipalism in front of world-space
 American scholar George Landow saw in hypertext a great potential for decolonization of knowledge. However, the latter was quickly subjected to new control dynamics that were previously unsuspected. At the same time, its content has also been "commodified" by hegemonic forces. (George Landow 2006) Our question is: to what extent could we free hypertext from the constraints imposed by Capital? Nico Carpentier underlines the importance of cities as an interface in the face of globalization, thanks to community hypermedia, in what he calls "translocalism". What he is proposing is, in our opinion, constitutes cybermunicipalism. (Nico Carpentier, p. 3) In fact, we would like to address this possibility in the present communication. From my perspective as a translator, I would like to address the issue by mobilizing, among other things, the concepts of "mechanized reproduction" by Walter Benjamin (1939) and "temporary autonomous zones" by Hakim Bey (1985), in order to establish certain avenues of meditation to abolish, in the twinkling of an eye, the dichotomy between global and local.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraduction et LanguesSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207