Penataan Fasilitas Jalur Pedestrian Sebagai Jalur Moda Pedestrian Lingkar Komplek Stadion Pakansari Cibinong, Kabupaten Bogor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pakansari Cibinong di Kabupaten Bogor merupakan stadion multifungsi yang memiliki fasilitas lintasan atletik di dalamnya dan fasilitas olahraga lain di dalam kompleknya. Pada bagian luar, komplek stadion dikelilingi oleh jalur kendaraan 2 arah dilengkapi dengan jalur pedestrian pada sisi kiri dan kanannya dengan kondisi masih kurang fungsional dan estetis. Permasalahan yang terjadi adalah keberadaan para pedagang kaki lima pada waktu-waktu tertentu ikut berkontribusi mengurangi nilai estetika kawasan selain penataan vegetasi yang buruk. Tujuan dari kegiatan perencanaan ini untuk meningkatkan kualitas lanskap jalur pedestrian agar lebih fungsional dan estetis sehingga mampu mendukung kebutuhan pengguna serta sekaligus memberikan rasa kenyamanan dan keamanan. Adapun metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam perencanaan ini yaitu metode diskriptip kuantitatif observasi, identifikasi, wawancara setra dan metode perencanaan oleh Gold mengenai studi behaviour setting. Dari hasil perencanaan ini diperoleh konsep penataan jalur pedestrian dengan pembagian ruang bagi aktivitas serta pergerakan pejalan kaki, pesepeda, dan jalur hijau yang lebih proporsional. Selain itu juga didapatkan rencana penataan ruang dan fasilitas sesuai agar tetap berkelanjutan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".