MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387168831 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.054036

Light-quark <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math> flavor splitting of heavy-light constituent diquark masses and doubly strange diquarks from QCD sum rules

2023· article· lv· W4387168831 on OpenAlexafffund
T. de Oliveira, D. Harnett, R. T. Kleiv, A. Palameta, T. G. Steele

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2023
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of the Fraser ValleyThompson Rivers UniversityUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsSum rule in quantum mechanicsParticle physicsDiquarkStrange quarkPseudoscalarQuantum chromodynamicsQuarkQCD sum rulesOrder (exchange)Scalar (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

QCD Laplace sum rules are used to examine the constituent mass spectrum of ${J}^{P}\ensuremath{\in}{{0}^{+},{1}^{+}}$ (scalar, axial vector) heavy-light $[Qq]$ diquarks with $Q\ensuremath{\in}{c,b}$ (charm, bottom) and $q\ensuremath{\in}{u,d,s}$ (up, down, strange). As in previous sum-rule studies, the negative parity ${J}^{P}\ensuremath{\in}{{0}^{\ensuremath{-}},{1}^{\ensuremath{-}}}$ (pseudoscalar, vector) $[Qq]$ diquark mass predictions do not stabilize, so the sum-rule analysis focuses on positive parity $[Qq]$ diquarks. Doubly strange ${J}^{P}={1}^{+}$ (axial vector) $[ss]$ diquarks are also examined, but the resulting sum rules do not stabilize. Hence there is no sum-rule evidence for ${J}^{P}={1}^{+}$ $[ss]$ diquark states, aiding the interpretation of sum-rule analyses of fully strange tetraquark states. The $SU(3)$ flavor splitting effects for $[Qq]$ diquarks are obtained by calculating QCD correlation functions of ${J}^{P}\ensuremath{\in}{{0}^{+},{1}^{+}}$ diquark composite operators up to next-to-leading order in perturbation theory, leading-order in the strange quark mass, and in the chiral limit for nonstrange ($u$, $d$) quarks with an isospin-symmetric vacuum $⟨\overline{n}n⟩=⟨\overline{u}u⟩=⟨\overline{d}d⟩$. Apart from the strange quark mass parameter ${m}_{s}$, the strange quark condensate parameter $\ensuremath{\kappa}=⟨\overline{s}s⟩/⟨\overline{n}n⟩$ has an important impact on $SU(3)$ flavor splittings. A Laplace sum-rule analysis methodology is developed for the mass difference ${M}_{[Qs]}\ensuremath{-}{M}_{[Qn]}$ between the strange and nonstrange heavy-light diquarks to reduce the theoretical uncertainties from all other QCD input parameters. The mass splitting is found to decrease with increasing $\ensuremath{\kappa}$, providing an upper bound on $\ensuremath{\kappa}$ where the ${M}_{[Qs]}\ensuremath{-}{M}_{[Qn]}$ mass hierarchy reverses. In the typical QCD sum-rule range $0.56&lt;\ensuremath{\kappa}&lt;0.74$, $55\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}\ensuremath{\lesssim}{M}_{[cs]}\ensuremath{-}{M}_{[cn]}\ensuremath{\lesssim}100\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}$ and $75\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}\ensuremath{\lesssim}{M}_{[bs]}\ensuremath{-}{M}_{[bn]}\ensuremath{\lesssim}\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}150\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}$, with a slight tendency for larger splittings for the ${J}^{P}={1}^{+}$ axial-vector channels. These constituent mass splitting results are discussed in comparison with values used in constituent diquark models for tetraquark and pentaquark hadronic states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207