MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387188811 · doi:10.18231/j.ijceo.2023.055

Posterior cerebral artery stroke with visual manifestation during COVID pandemic

2023· article· en· W4387188811 on OpenAlexaff
Ziaul Haq Yasir, Rakesh Sharma, Rajiv Khandekar, Divya Kesarwani

Bibliographic record

VenueIndian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Optic Conditions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStroke (engine)Neurovascular bundleMedicinePandemicNeurologyTimelineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Posterior cerebral arteryPhysical medicine and rehabilitationCardiologyInternal medicinePathologyMiddle cerebral arteryIschemiaDiseasePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The posterior cerebral artery (PCA) stroke represents 5% to 10% of total strokes. The number of stroke cases has increased during the Global pandemic of Covid 19. It can be challenging to diagnose PCA stroke presenting as a visual manifestation, as symptoms are nonspecific and variable over due course of time. This is more complex in patients who are not aware of their symptoms, and therefore difficult to establish a timeline of events. Mostly PCA stroke with only visual symptoms visits an ophthalmologist rather than an emergency attendee. Knowledge of the neurovascular anatomy of the brain is required to understand PCA stroke and identify the stroke’s mechanism to select appropriate therapies. In this article, we provide an overview of PCA stroke and focused on visual manifestations, diagnosis, and management of PCA stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndian Journal of Clinical and Experimental OphthalmologySame topicRetinal and Optic ConditionsFrench-language works237,207