MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modelling the Carrying Capacity of Water Resources for Sustainable Water Ecology Using Vensim

2023· article· en· W4387196524 on OpenAlex
Jian Zhang, Nor Faiza Abd Rahman, Jenny Ong

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Professional Business Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Resources and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Transports
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWater resourcesCarrying capacityEnvironmental scienceEcologyEnvironmental resource managementSystem dynamicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to address the growing challenges associated with water resources due to population growth, rapid economic expansion, and the imbalance between supply and demand. It aims to investigate the importance of water as a fundamental resource for ecological preservation and sustainable economic development. Design/Methodology/Approach: In this study, a comprehensive approach was taken to analyze water resources carrying capacity (WRCC) using the Vensim modeling tool. The research methodology involves considering the multifaceted roles of water resources within the complex ecological, environmental, societal, and economic systems, as well as their interrelationships with other system components. Findings: The findings of the study highlight the critical need for increasing investment in environmental protection and initiating new water storage projects to enhance the region's water resource carrying capacity. This research underscores the importance of sustainable water ecology in addressing the challenges posed by population growth and economic expansion. Research, Practical & Social Implications: This study has significant implications for research, practical applications, and societal well-being. It emphasizes the importance of understanding and managing water resources in a sustainable manner to ensure ecological health, economic development, and social progress. The findings can inform policy decisions and guide actions to address water resource challenges. Originality/Value: The originality and value of this study lie in its holistic approach to assessing WRCC and its consideration of the complex interactions between water resources, ecology, environment, society, and the economy. The research provides insights into the unique challenges faced by regions with increasing water resource demands and pollution and offers a modeling tool for measuring and enhancing water carrying capacity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it