MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387197028 · doi:10.1109/temc.2023.3317917

Modeling Electrically Long Interconnects Using Physics-Informed Delayed Gaussian Processes

2023· article· en· W4387197028 on OpenAlexaff
Federico Garbuglia, Torsten Reuschel, Christian Schuster, Dirk Deschrijver, Tom Dhaene, Domenico Spina

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersVlaamse regeringFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
KeywordsHyperparameterGaussian processGaussianKernel (algebra)AlgorithmSmoothnessEstimation theoryApplied mathematicsMathematicsComputer scienceMathematical analysisPhysicsDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents a machine learning technique to model wide-band scattering parameters (S-parameters) of interconnects in the frequency domain using a new Gaussian processes (GP) model. Standard GPs with a general-purpose kernel typically assume high smoothness and therefore are not suitable to model S-parameters that are highly dynamic and oscillating due to propagation delays. The new delayed Gaussian process ( <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\tau$</tex-math></inline-formula> GP) model employs a physics-informed kernel consisting of periodic components, whose fundamental frequencies are interpreted as tunable propagation delays. Then, the model hyperparameters are tuned using a combination of maximum marginal likelihood estimation (MMLE) and delay estimation using Gabor transform. The delay estimation allows one to automatically identify the optimal fundamental frequencies for the kernel, thus increasing the numerical stability of the hyperparameters tuning process. The resulting delayed Gaussian process model accurately predicts the S-parameter values at desired frequency points in the training interval. Two application examples demonstrate the increased accuracy of the new technique, compared to standard Gaussian processes, vector fitting (VF), and delayed vector fitting (DVF) rational models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.238
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic CompatibilitySame topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise SuppressionFrench-language works237,207