MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387217175 · doi:10.59697/jik.v5i1.319

PENGEMBANGAN MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS VIDEO SPARKOL DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MEDIA INTERNET DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA SMP NEGERI 1 DAN 2 KECAMATAN TANAH JAWA

2021· article· en· W4387217175 on OpenAlexaff
Imeldawaty Gultom, Marto Sihombing, Akim Manaor Hara Pardede

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Informatika Kaputama (JIK) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSTEM Education
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe InternetCurriculumComputer scienceMathematics educationCoding (social sciences)Identification (biology)MultimediaWorld Wide WebPedagogyPsychologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The existence of the internet and all existing facilities can provide new knowledge or browse teaching materials for teachers so that the internet is an easier learning medium and can enrich teachers' insights. This study aims to determine the use of sparkol video as a learning resource for mathematics teachers of SMP Negeri Tanah Jawa District. Sparkol video-based internet learning media is made with the Videoscribe application, as a learning medium that can be used in schools and outside of school. The research aims to develop learning media that can be accessed freely on the Internet. Sparkol video-based internet learning model used is videoscribe which is open and mass. The learning curriculum also provides a set of learning tools covering, various questions, quizzes, and forms of assignments. The research implementation steps follow the general pattern of scientific research with an object-oriented approach with the stages of identification (identification), analysis (analysis), design (design), coding (programming) and testing (testing). This study produced an outcome that was targeted at the results of this study in the form of articles to be published in an Accredited National Journal. This article also aims to disseminate the results of research and science that can be used to broaden the knowledge and development of science in the future, especially in finding association rules between indicators of achieving competency standards tested in mathematics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.190

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Informatika Kaputama (JIK)Same topicSTEM EducationFrench-language works237,207