MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387236351 · doi:10.14740/jnr752

Measurement of Electrophysiology, Sexual Dysfunction, and Cognitive Impairment in Patients With Diabetes Referred for Neuropathy Symptoms: A Case-Control Study

2023· article· en· W4387236351 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Leila Simani, Muhanna Kazempour, Mahtab Ramezani, Faezeh Maghsudloo, Hasan Kazazi, Sahar Abedi, Zahra Fatehi, Fatemeh Ghorbani, Ehsan Karimialavijeh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
KeywordsMedicineSexual dysfunctionSexual functionDiabetes mellitusMontreal Cognitive AssessmentDiabetic neuropathyInternal medicineCognitionBeck Depression InventoryPhysical therapyPsychiatryEndocrinologyCognitive impairmentAnxiety

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The association between diabetic neuropathy, cognitive impairment, and sexual dysfunction together in patients with diabetes mellites (DM) is not assessed in prior studies. This study aimed to investigate the association between all these microvascular complications of DM. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 162 participants (110 diabetic patients and 52 non-diabetic subjects). Neuropathy was evaluated by neuropathy disability score (NDS) and neuropathy symptom score (NSS). Nerve conduction study (NCS), sural and radial sensory nerve action potential, sural/radial nerve amplitude ratio (SRAR), and tibial compound muscle action potential were measured. Participants underwent cognitive and sexual assessments by Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), Beck depression score, female sexual function index, and the male sexual function index questionnaires. Results: Both groups showed a decline in cognitive functions; however, diabetic patients had a significantly lower score in MoCA compared to the non-diabetic group (mean ± standard deviation: 20.98 ± 5.07, 23.17 ± 4.47; P value < 0.001). No statistical difference was observed regarding sexual activity (P value = 0.12 and 0.39 for female and male sexual function index), and Beck score (mean ± standard deviation: 8.56 ± 6.47, 8.96 ± 4.74; P value = 0.451) between the two groups. The NCS parameters were notably different in both groups. There were no differences between NCS, NDS, and NSS findings and sexual function. Conclusions: Our data suggest that NCS parameters, even SRAR, do not necessarily correlate with cognitive performance and sexual function. Sexual dysfunction was not correlated with diabetic neuropathy, but clinical findings of NDS and NSS showed a modestly negative correlation with cognitive function. J Neurol Res. 2023;13(1):50-55 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jnr752

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology ResearchSame topicPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207